Bear in mind the whiteboards in our school rooms? Sure, those with a pen and an eraser. We wrongly thought we might by no means see them after graduating. Fortunately, the digital period introduced them again.
FigJam and Miro are two digital whiteboard titans fostering workforce collaboration and communication. These instruments are well-versed with the mandatory options to let groups ideate, plan, and co-create innovation.
When you’re confused about which one to decide on on your workforce, you’re on the proper place.
On this FigJam vs. Miro article, we’ll examine all the pieces from interface to options and integrations to pricing. However first, let’s perceive why you really need an internet whiteboard software.
The Significance of On-line Whiteboard Instruments In At present’s Digital Period
Collaborative on-line whiteboard instruments have turn into indispensable for distant groups. They provide numerous advantages that improve productiveness, foster innovation, and streamline communication.
#1. Boosts Distant Collaboration
Whiteboards function a shared digital area for real-time interplay. They encourage groups to co-create content material, enabling energetic engagement throughout an internet assembly. This degree of interactivity advantages distant groups because it permits them to collaborate as if in the identical room.
#2. Fosters Innovation
Success calls for innovation, and that, my buddy, is feasible by offering a platform for structured innovation workshops.
On-line whiteboards come loaded with instruments present in the actual world, equivalent to sticky notes and pens. Though the instruments shadow digital media, the mix fosters creativity and innovation, even within the remotest works.
#3. Visualize Tasks
Utilizing on-line whiteboards, groups can visualize tasks from starting to finish. Having the roadmap pictured in an easy-to-understand method, groups get assist making futuristic selections.
The visualization ensures each workforce member has a single supply of fact. Thus, much less misunderstanding coupled with higher distribution of knowledge.
#4. Arrange Data
On-line whiteboards assist centralize undertaking data below one roof. It offers a single supply of fact whereas saving time looking for completely different recordsdata throughout platforms. On the flip facet, this makes accessibility fast and simple with reference at hand, facilitating comfort.
#5. Keep Inclusive
On-line whiteboards be certain that every member’s voice is heard, fostering an inclusive atmosphere. Most whiteboard software program has instruments that encourage inclusivity, permitting different opinions and concepts to move freely.
Let’s now perceive every platform – FigJam and Miro carefully 👇
FigJam: Overview
FigJam by Figma is an internet whiteboard software elevating the best way groups collaborate these days.
The platform is constructed protecting the trendy workforce in thoughts. It offers a shared interactive area the place you’ll be able to outline concepts, align your determination, and fasten your working tempo.
FigJam isn’t only a brainstorming or planning platform; it creates an atmosphere greatest suited to real-time collaboration and engagement.
Whether or not you’re a part of a design workforce trying to visualize ideas, or a undertaking workforce placing methods collectively, FigJam can bridge the hole between concepts and folks, connecting them collectively.
Miro: Overview
Miro Whiteboard is designed to uphold collaboration and creativity amongst a workforce. It’s a digital drafting board the place concepts are analyzed, developed, scaled, and became action-based plans.
Miro has a toolkit constructed for each sorts of groups – the quick ones, who’re good at brainstorming concepts in a day. And the sluggish ones, who take time, leverage sticky notes and provide you with a stable concept.
Better of all, Miro isn’t only a digital whiteboard; it’s a spot the place you’ll be able to work from anyplace at any time. The platform transcends precise area versus bodily workplace areas.
It empowers over 50M+ customers, together with design, advertising, and engineering groups from prime corporations like Cisco, Deloitte, and HP.
FigJam vs. Miro: UI & Expertise
Each FigJam and Miro are well-respected whiteboard collaboration instruments that convey collectively distinctive options that may serve the completely different wants of you and your workforce.
FigJam is knowledgeable whiteboard software meant for design groups, because it excels in illustrating concepts. It enhances Figma’s highly effective and versatile design atmosphere with the power for collaboration on design tasks throughout groups.
The software presents illustration options like icons and shapes for creating flowcharts, community diagrams, and concept maps that you could simply use with a drag-and-drop interface.
It begins with a free starter plan containing primary options, adopted by month-to-month subscription plans beginning at $3.
The subscription plan consists of superior options like workforce libraries by means of which design groups can retailer paperwork and audio on-line, making wireframing extra interactive.
Miro is a platform for visible collaboration that goals to reinforce workforce effectiveness. With an emphasis on digital whiteboard creation, it makes use of a number of instruments that assist groups collaborate seamlessly.
Miro permits limitless workforce members as a part of their free plan. The platform’s paid plans vary from $8 to $14 per 30 days and supply limitless boards, non-public board sharing, customized templates, and superior consideration administration.
Winner: FigJam and Miro, each dominate their respective trade and subject of experience.
When you’re in a inventive trade like advertising or design, investing in one thing like FigJam would possibly make sense.
Nonetheless, utilizing one thing like Miro could be extra acceptable in case you’re working with enterprise ideas equivalent to buyer journeys, storyboards, or thoughts mapping.
In addition to, Miro dates again to being older than FigJam. It’s richer in functionalities and options, permitting you to do way more than inventive designs.
FigJam vs. Miro: Ease of Use
FigJam is an easy-to-use software with intuitive options and a minimalistic design, enabling customers to start out off with none exterior help.
The software presents a superb workflow for a workforce’s design course of. In addition to, the user-friendliness of Figjam makes it accessible to everybody on the workforce – irrespective of if they’re simply an intern or a supervisor.
Miro has a number of options that you’ll have to perceive, resulting in a steep studying curve. Though Miro makes an attempt to be as versatile as potential, its programming structure remains to be easier than FigJam’s.
This would possibly compel you to assume that the platform presents fewer functionalities. Nonetheless, when you learn to exploit the capabilities, you discover Miro’s in depth canvas, various toolset, and common ergonomics fairly fascinating.
Winner: When you ask me, you’ve a greater probability of getting faster on the job with FigJam than Miro.
Firstly, FigJam doesn’t essentially require a lot coaching and could be simply utilized by anybody. Subsequent, it helps gamify the whole consumer expertise through animations and hand-drawn parts. And lastly, because it has restricted options, the training curve is much less comparatively.
FigJam vs. Miro: Collaboration
FigJam lets a number of customers work on the identical canvas concurrently, with modifications mirrored in real-time. The platform options communication instruments like reside cursors, commenting, and in-app voice chat, which assist groups get collectively for evaluate or brainstorming about a problem.
FigJam’s integration with Figma’s design software is one other feather in its cap. The mixing delivers a easy transition from ideation in FigJam to execution in Figma.
If we discuss Miro, it permits customers to simply collaborate on a number of tasks without delay. Moreover, Miro extends past particular person display contact enter.
It helps AOP (Superior Pointer), a pure pen response know-how, enabling far-field consumer interplay (equivalent to graphic annotation options) to edit throughout a number of collaborating surfaces.
Winner: Being whiteboard titans, FigJam and Miro supply passable collaboration options. Each are at their greatest skills to offer seamless collaboration between you and your workforce. So, it’s a win-win for each!
FigJam vs. Miro: Customization Choices
FigJam has fewer customization choices than Miro, though the options are intuitive and simple to make use of. Listed here are some key customization choices offered by FigJam:
- Customers can customise their workspaces with completely different shapes, sticky notes, and customizable textual content types
- Permits customers to import photographs and use drawing instruments for personalization
- Supplies a set of pre-built templates
Miro presents a complete set of customization choices that enhance its scope of utility over different comparable toolsets. Listed here are some key customization choices offered by Miro:
- An enormous library of custom-made templates that go well with quite a lot of use instances
- Permits customers so as to add and customise a number of parts equivalent to shapes, sticky notes, photographs, and even complicated diagrams
- Customers can simply import recordsdata from exterior sources equivalent to Google Drive or Dropbox for additional customizations
- Helps a number of doc sources permitting customers to prototype giant tasks on the go
Winner: FigJam and Miro share the ground in the case of customizations.Though Miro presents much better templates and interactive parts than FigJam, the latter supply drawing instruments to let customers customise parts in a free-style.
FigJam vs. Miro: Template Availability
FigJam presents easy base templates to assist customers by no means begin from scratch. These templates help undertaking managers and groups in taking step one for brainstorming. FigJam usually offers templates for affinity mapping, flowcharting, and diagramming.
A look on the reside platform reveals that the software depends on simplicity and ease of use. The identical goes for its outlined set of templates.
Whereas Miro has a diversified template library, it may possibly make it easier to with an array of complicated duties and tasks.
The templates allow groups to get off the bottom even when the work entails each conventional brainstorming parts like affinity mapping and newer agile strategies designed to facilitate undertaking planning.
Winner: Miro is a transparent winner right here. The software has an array of templates starting from brainstorming to mapping and undertaking planning. Moreover, the customization choices are current in abundance – so that you by no means have to start out from scratch.
FigJam vs. Miro: Third-Get together Integration
FigJam integrates with numerous instruments that you just and your workforce would possibly use within the design course of. A few of these embrace:
- Slack for workforce communication
- Jira for undertaking administration
- Dropbox for file storage and collaboration
- GitHub for model management
These integrations assist streamline the workflow. Furthermore, customers get direct entry to third-party information sources inside FigJam.
On a greater notice, Miro integrates over 130+ apps and instruments. It primarily integrates with instruments helpful in undertaking administration, communication, and enhancing productiveness.
It additionally collaborates with some highly effective plugins from Atlassian (Jira, Confluence, Trello), Slack, Google Workspace, and JesterCoders, amongst many others.
Winner: Whereas FigJam integrates with a good variety of collaboration instruments, Miro integrates over 130+ third-party instruments. It has instruments and plugins for collaboration, planning, non-public workspaces, and extra. Subsequently, Miro has the higher hand right here.
FigJam vs. Miro: Subscription Plans
FigJam presents a free endlessly plan permitting limitless collaborators however solely 3 Figma and FigJam recordsdata. Its premium plans begin at $3 per consumer per 30 days, lower than a 3rd of the price of mainstream whiteboard rivals.
On the similar time, Miro additionally presents a free plan with limitless customers, a single workspace, and as much as 3 editable boards. Its paid plans begin at $8 per consumer per 30 days. For superior collaboration and huge groups, it has a marketing strategy beginning at $16 per consumer, billed yearly.
Winner: In terms of being pocket-friendly, FigJam wins within the pricing race. You see, FigJam is over 3 occasions cheaper than Miro on the workforce plan.
Moreover, in case you’re a pupil or educator, you’ll be able to avail the skilled plan totally free. So, sure, a little bit of contribution in the direction of society has made the FigJam pricing mannequin extra engaging than Miro.
| Options | FigJam | Miro | Winner |
| Consumer Interface and Expertise | Has a versatile design atmosphere | Is nice for working as a workforce | Each |
| Ease of Use and Studying Curve | Fewer options imply straightforward to make use of | Has templates in all design classes | FigJam |
| Actual-Time Collaboration | Nice | Nice | Each |
| Customization Choices | Passable | Higher | Miro |
| Templates | Has a free plan, however paid plans are costly | Has an infinite template library | Miro |
| Third-Get together Integration | Integrates with all in style apps | Has a a lot greater integration library | Miro |
| Pricing | Comes with a free plan and reasonably priced pricing | Has a free plan however paid plans are costly | FigJam |
One Whiteboard Instrument You Should Have In Your Toolset Arsenal
To my shock, Miro has provide you with much better options and functionalities in comparison with FigJam.
Furthermore, the software guarantees to be a stand-alone answer for inventive distant groups, fostering creativity whereas being able to dealing with complicated duties.
FigJam doesn’t have integration capabilities like Miro, making Miro an ideal whiteboard software for big groups with numerous information and variables of their undertaking.