How Fast is SUCURI CDN (Test Result)?

SUCURI is a cloud-based safety supplier (CBSP), however have you learnt that it comes with a world CDN (Content material Supply Community)?

CDN is included by default if you happen to subscribe to the Web site Firewall (WAF) or Web site Safety Platform plan.

CDN JUICES is a world anycast community out there within the following areas to hurry up your web site.

  • Europe – London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Bulgaria
  • America – San Jose, Washington, Dallas, Sao Paulo, Chicago, Miami
  • Asia – Tokyo, Singapore, Sydney

A few of the efficiency advantages of their CDN are:

  • GZIP compression for useful resource optimization
  • HTTP/2 help for loading parallel sources over a single TCP connection
  • Good caching choices to ship requested content material quicker and cut back server load/bandwidth
  • Fast setup (activate in lower than 5 minutes)
  • Combine effectively with different CDN like Cloudflare, StackPath, and so on.

In my earlier put up I defined methods to arrange SUCURI with WordPress, and a few of you requested that share efficiency advantages.

So please…

Check particulars

To provide you an concept of ​​what I used for these benchmark checks.

  • I’m utilizing my lab area (bloggerflare.com) hosted on shared internet hosting from SiteGround in Singapore information heart.
  • I’ve put in WordPress and am utilizing the Newspaper theme.
  • No cache plugin is used

And on the finish of this text, I’ve added an outline of the achievements.

Loading time of the location with out SUCURI

I used a number of instruments to check the load time from totally different areas around the globe, and listed below are the outcomes.

Pingdom

It took 5.13 seconds to load from New York.

pingdom-for-juices

Geekflare Instruments

It took 2.12 seconds from Mumbai and three.69 from Oregon.

gf-tools-before-sucuri

Right here you can even see that the time for loading the primary byte is above 350ms from each areas.

Internet web page check

7.96 seconds from Singapore utilizing net web page check.

web page test-without-sucuri

Now I’ll route the visitors by SUCURI and can run a pace check to check the outcomes.

Comment: I up to date my area NS file to level to SUCURI DNS.

Web site loading time with SUCURI

I repeat the check I did when bloggerflare.com pointed on to SiteGround.

Pingdom

Lower than 1 second.

pingdom juices

Astonishing.

Geek Flare Instruments

geekflare-tools-sucuri

990 ms from Oregon and a couple of.85 seconds from Mumbai. TTFB dropped dramatically from ~300 ms to 18 ms from Oregon and 128 from Mumbai.

Internet web page check

I do not know why, nevertheless it did not present a lot enchancment over different testing instruments.

web page test juices

Abstract loading time

Let’s check out the loading time earlier than and after SUCURI implementation.

Time in seconds.

Check instruments For After
Pingdom 5.1 1
GF (Iowa) 2.1 1
GF (Mumbai) 3.6 2.8
Internet web page check 7.9 6.6

Not solely the full time it takes to load the web page has improved, but in addition: TTFB (time to first byte) is about 50% quicker.

I hope this fast check outcome provides you an concept of ​​the efficiency of SUCURI CDN. It additionally helps to make clear that implementing WAF is not going to decelerate the location.

If you wish to add safety safety and enhance web page load time, then SUCURI is price contemplating.

Rate this post
porno izle altyazılı porno porno